What is the Uberleague? Click here for an explanation


Southeast DivisionNorthern DivisionCentral DivisionWestern Division
AlabamaIowaArkansasBoise State
AuburnMichiganKansas StateBYU
FloridaMichigan StateLSUColorado
Florida StateNotre DameMissouriNebraska
GeorgiaOhio StateOklahomaOregon
MiamiPenn StateTCUStanford
TennesseeWest VirginiaTexasUSC
Virginia TechWisconsinTexas A&MUtah


Out (11/28/2010): Washington
Out (11/28/2010): Texas Tech
Out (11/28/2010): Louisville
In (11/28/2010): Stanford
In (11/28/2010): Michigan State
In (11/28/2010): Arkansas

Out (11/07/2010): Boston College
In (11/07/2010): Texas A&M

Monday, December 6, 2010

Uberleague Rank: December 5, 2010


It matters who number one is.

Auburn and Oregon traded places this week, the final week before bowl games start. As a result, the two teams change their Uberleague ranking by a combined total of 10 positions. In real life, the two will meet in the national championship game, so their rankings are moot for this season.

Farther down the chart, two other pairs of teams traded AP ranking: Oklahoma-Boise State and Texas A&M-South Carolina. The sum total of positions changed for those pairs is one, a gain by Oklahoma. Basically irrelevant. Not like number one.

It matters who number one is.

Uberleague RkTeamUberleague ptsChange in rank from last week2010 AP Rating
1Florida306.80--
2Ohio State290.38-6
3USC244.16--
4Texas234.44--
5Auburn198.19+6 1
6Alabama197.32+2 15
7LSU196.75-211
8Oklahoma196.20+1 9
9Florida State194.53-323
10Miami174.77--
11Oregon170.69-42
12Nebraska163.43-17
13Virginia Tech156.15-12
14Georgia149.71--
15TCU140.50-3
16Penn State136.60--
17Wisconsin134.03-4
18Michigan132.34--
19Boise State122.33-10
20Tennessee120.15--
21Utah105.38-20
22West Virginia92.42-22
23Iowa78.69--
24Notre Dame68.33--
25Kansas State65.01--
26Missouri62.93-14
27BYU61.63--
28Texas A&M51.88-18
29Stanford49.99-5
30Michigan State49.91-7
31Colorado49.81--
32Arkansas47.20-8
-
Thisisthecut.
-
33Louisville47.16--
34Texas Tech46.45--
35Washington46.01--
36Boston College45.58--
37Georgia Tech45.46--
38Cincinnati43.55--
39Ole Miss39.99--
40Washington State38.18--
41Oregon State37.16--
42Clemson36.68--
43Cal32.56--
44Arizona State30.76--
45Oklahoma State30.49-16
46UCLA30.33--
47Syracuse28.35--
48Kansas27.06--
49Mississippi State26.16-21
50South Carolina24.52-19

Monday, November 29, 2010

Uberleague Rank: November 28, 2010


We welcome an unprecedented number of new teams to the Uberleague this week. Three new teams (Stanford, Michigan State and Arkansas) made the cut this week. Arkansas and Michigan State finished their regular seasons well: Michigan State with a share of the Big 10 title, and Arkansas with a shot at a BCS bowl game. Stanford blanked Oregon State 38-0 and is a Cal game away from a potential BCS bowl game too. The three teams they displaced, Washington, Louisville and Texas Tech, have failed to be ranked all season. Neither Washington's success in the early 90's nor Louisville's success in the mid-2000s is enough to get them in to the Uberleague, at least as of this week. Texas Tech, a team just barely in for several seasons, is now just barely out.

So where to place them within the Uberleague? Stanford is of course a natural fit in the Western division, and an easy substitute for Washington. Michigan State is a natural fit in the Big Ten-dominated Northern division. But Arkansas, a team located one county away from Oklahoma, could be a natural fit in either the Big 12-dominated Central division or the SEC-dominated Southeast division. If Arkansas was placed in the Southeast division, it would mean that either another SEC team would have to move to another division or a Florida team would have to move to another division. In this case, I chose to maintain geographic ties rather than conference ties (after all, the Uberleague is meant to disrupt conference ties). Therefore Arkansas will go to the Central division, along with their rival LSU from the Texas-bordering state of Louisiana. Virginia Tech, a school just up Interstate 81 a bit from the University of Tennessee, moves to the Southeast division.

Uberleague RkTeamUberleague ptsChange in rank from last week2010 AP Rating
1Florida306.80--
2Ohio State290.38-6
3USC244.16--
4Texas234.44--
5LSU196.75-11
6Florida State196.16+2 20
7Oregon195.69-1
8Alabama195.47-217
9Oklahoma193.93-10
10Miami174.77--
11Auburn173.19-2
12Nebraska167.64-13
13Virginia Tech156.15+1 12
14Georgia149.71+1 -
15TCU140.50+3 3
16Penn State136.60--
17Wisconsin134.03+2 4
18Michigan132.34-1-
19Boise State124.60-69
20Tennessee120.15--
21Utah104.79-21
22West Virginia91.92+1 23
23Iowa78.69-1-
24Notre Dame68.33--
25Kansas State65.01--
26Missouri61.83-15
27BYU61.63--
28Texas A&M51.16-19
29Stanford49.99+7 5
30Michigan State49.91+8 7
31Colorado49.81-2-
32Arkansas47.20+8 8
-
Thisisthecut.
-
33Louisville47.16-3-
34Texas Tech46.45-3-
35Washington46.01-3-
36Boston College45.58-3-
37Georgia Tech45.46-3-
38Cincinnati43.55-3-
39Ole Miss39.99-2-
40Washington State38.18+1 -
41Oregon State37.16+1 -
42Clemson36.68+1 -
43Cal32.56+2 -
44Arizona State30.76+2 -
45Oklahoma State30.49-616
46UCLA30.33+1 -
47Syracuse28.35+1 -
48Kansas27.06+2 -
49Mississippi State25.62+3 22
50South Carolina25.24+1 18

Monday, November 22, 2010

Uberleague Rank: November 21, 2010



Uberleague RkTeamUberleague ptsChange in rank from last week2010 AP Rating
1Florida306.80--
2Ohio State282.88-8
3USC244.16--
4Texas234.44--
5LSU211.18-6
6Alabama206.95-9
7Oregon195.69-1
8Florida State195.03+2 22
9Oklahoma187.68-14
10Miami174.77-2-
11Auburn173.19+1 2
12Nebraska164.30-116
13Boise State157.33-3
14Virginia Tech154.73-13
15Georgia149.71--
16Penn State136.60--
17Michigan132.34--
18TCU130.50-4
19Wisconsin126.89-5
20Tennessee120.15--
21Utah103.74-23
22Iowa90.23-24
23West Virginia79.92--
24Notre Dame68.33--
25Kansas State65.01--
26Missouri61.83-15
27BYU61.63--
28Texas A&M52.66-17
29Colorado49.81--
30Louisville47.16--
31Texas Tech46.45--
32Washington46.01--
-
Thisisthecut
-
33Boston College45.58--
34Georgia Tech45.46--
35Cincinnati43.55--
36Stanford40.47-7
37Ole Miss39.99--
38Michigan State39.66-11
39Oklahoma State38.83+4 10
40Arkansas38.63-12
41Washington State38.18-2-
42Oregon State37.16-1-
43Clemson36.68-1-
44Arizona33.63+1 20
45Cal32.56-1-
46Arizona State30.76--
47UCLA30.33--
48Syracuse28.35--
49NC State28.22+9 21
50Kansas27.06-1-

Monday, November 15, 2010

Uberleague Rank: November 14, 2010



Uberleague RkTeamUberleague ptsChange in rank from last week2010 AP Rating
1Florida306.80--
2Ohio State282.88-8
3USC257.80-20
4Texas234.44--
5LSU216.53-5
6Alabama204.68-10
7Oregon195.69-1
8Miami186.31+3 24
9Oklahoma185.59-116
10Florida State182.53-1-
11Nebraska174.91-19
12Auburn173.19-2
13Boise State157.33+2 3
14Virginia Tech153.48-114
15Georgia149.71-1-
16Penn State136.60+1 -
17Michigan132.34+1 -
18TCU130.50-24
19Wisconsin121.53-6
20Tennessee120.15--
21Utah102.85-25
22Iowa91.73-21
23West Virginia79.92--
24Notre Dame68.33--
25Kansas State65.01--
26Missouri61.83+1 15
27BYU61.63-1-
28Texas A&M51.88+1 18
29Colorado49.81-1-
30Louisville47.16--
31Texas Tech46.45--
32Washington46.01--
-
Thisisthecut.
-
33Boston College45.58--
34Georgia Tech45.46--
35Cincinnati43.55--
36Stanford40.47+1 7
37Ole Miss39.99+1 -
38Michigan State39.66-211
39Washington State38.18--
40Arkansas37.20+2 13
41Oregon State37.16-1-
42Clemson36.68-1-
43Oklahoma State35.25-12
44Cal32.56+1 -
45Arizona31.99-123
46Arizona State30.76--
47UCLA30.33--
48Syracuse28.35+1 -
49Kansas27.06+1 -
50South Carolina26.02+2 17

Thursday, November 11, 2010

The Uberleague, Explained

What is this "Uberleague," you ask? Basically it is my attempt to remedy the mess that is college football. It is a proposed method by which we do away with the BCS and install a playoff system that is fair and conclusive.

In 2008, then-candidate Barack Obama came out in favor of an 8-team playoff system to remedy the broken college football system, which would have replaced the current 2-team playoff of one game. But for a man who has been the face of change, this is an especially small-ball populist approach to the main problem in college football; that is, the subjectiveness of the sportswriters determining which teams are the most worthy.

If we were to implement an 8-team playoff system, the annual stew would be about why the 9th and 10th place teams didn't get in. The NCAA basketball tournament has the same problem with subjectivity, but their solution was to expand the field to such a gargantuan size that the difficult decision on if a bubble team gets in or not is practically moot. Who cares if the Richmond Spiders or the Creighton Blue Jays didn't quite make it? They were probably going to lose in the first round anyways.

Most professional sports leagues don't require a human to determine which teams deserve a post-season. This is because there are only 20 or 30 possible teams to choose from. Everyone's schedule has relatively the same factor of difficulty, and so no team has to be handicapped by a sportswriter or poll voter. In college football, there are 100+ teams to choose from, and one team can only play at most 12 or 13 other teams. Comparing teams thus requires some subjective factors, because head-to-head matchups are rare between non-conference foes.

But not everything is subjective. Athletic conference winners are determined not by sportswriters or strength-of-schedule, but by teams actually playing each other. There are tiebreak rules and everything in case two teams have an equal record at the end of the season. Conferences can do this because there are only between 8 and 12 teams to choose from. But unfortunately not all conferences are created equal. If we just had conference winners play each other as a playoff system, the new argument would be something like "why does the Big East #1 get to have a chance at a championship while the clearly superior Big 12 #2 doesn't?"

___________________________________

What I am proposing is that we blow-up the conferences and create a 32-team Uberleague. The Uberleague will consist of 4 divisions of 8 regionally-similar teams.

Each team will play 12 games: 7 games within the division, one game each from the other 3 divisions, and 2 games from the pool of college teams outside the Uberleague. This way old-fashioned college rivalries can remain intact even when one team is in the Superleague and the other team is not.

After the end of the Uberleague season (the first week in December), a twelve-team playoff will commence. The playoff will be a seeded tournament, with the top four seeds given to each division's champion.

The seeding will be based on best overall record. Tiebreaks outside the division will be, in order, as follows: head-to-head matchups, if applicable, then league record, then divisional record, then record against common teams (minimum possible = 2), then quality of best win, then quality of second best win, etc., and then coin flip.

Division winners will be based on the divisional record. Tiebreaks within the division will be based on head-to-head record. In the event of a three-way tie, divisional winner will be determined based on tiebreak rules similar to interdivisional tiebreak rules.

When there are two teams with the same overall record within the same division, the team with the better divisional record cannot be seeded lower than the team with the worse divisional record.

The top four seeds earn a bye week and a home game similar to the NFL's playoff system.

The playoffs will occupy four straight weekends starting in the second weekend in December and ending the first weekend of January.

But here's the part that makes this Uberleague more interesting than every other professional league: relegation. The bottom team in each division should be kicked out of the Uberleague for the next year. The best four teams from the remaining 88 college teams outside the Uberleague would be promoted to the Uberleague the next year. Because every crappy team needs a healthy dose of fear to get them to perform to their fullest.

_________________________


So which teams should be in the Uberleague? I believe that it shouldn't just be the 32 best teams from this year. To make the Uberleague palatable, it needs to include not only the best teams, but also perennial contenders who are going through some down times (like Michigan). The Uberleague is designed to contain the teams with certain gravitas; if a team went to, say, the Rose Bowl a couple of times in the '90s but has failed to make a splash since then (Northwestern), that team would not get into the inaugural Uberleague. However, if a team was a powerhouse from a bygone era (Navy; Clemson, maybe; Arkansas) without any more recent success, they would not make it into the inaugural Uberleague. Memories are short.

So I came up with a very simple formula based on the final AP rating of each college team for the past twenty years that expands geometrically as seed approaches 1 and year approaches the current year, with a few tweaks to soften the mathematical effects. This rewards both consistency and excellence.

The 32 teams chosen by this formula are updated every week during the college football season. The formula was designed so that there would not be a lot of variability in the composition of the Uberleague from week to week, but teams at the margins could see their rankings move enough to put them either in or out of the Uberleague.

Uberleague Rank: November 7, 2010


Uberleague Rk Uberleague pts Rank last week 2010 AP Rating
1 Florida 318.34 1 24
2 Ohio State 282.88 2 8
3 USC 244.16 3-
4 Texas 234.44 4 -
5 LSU 216.53 7 5
6 Alabama 202.75 5 11
7 Oregon 195.69 6 1
8 Oklahoma 183.21 9 19
9 Florida State 182.53 8 -
10 Nebraska 174.91 10 9
11 Miami 174.77 11 -
12 Auburn 173.19 13 2
13 Virginia Tech 151.39 15 16
14 Georgia 149.71 14 -
15 Boise State 147.33 12 4
16 TCU 140.50 18 3
17 Penn State 136.60 16 -
18 Michigan 132.34 17 -
19 Wisconsin 121.53 21 6
20 Tennessee 120.15 20 -
21 Utah 109.39 19 15
22 Iowa 98.69 22 13
23 West Virginia 79.92 23 -
24 Notre Dame 68.33 24 -
25 Kansas State 65.01 25 -
26 BYU 61.63 27 -
27 Missouri 57.82 26 20
28 Colorado 49.81 28 -
29 Texas A&M 48.88 39 23
30 Louisville 47.16 29 -
31 Texas Tech 46.45 30 -
32 Washington 46.01 31 -
-
Thisisthecut
-
33 Boston College 45.58 32 -
34 Georgia Tech 45.46 33 -
35 Cincinnati 43.55 34 -
36 Michigan State 41.58 41 10
37 Stanford 40.47 44 7
38 Ole Miss 39.99 36 -
39 Washington State 38.18 37 -
40 Oregon State 37.16 38 -
41 Clemson 36.68 40 -
42 Arkansas 35.95 42 14
43 Oklahoma State 35.25 48 12
44 Arizona 34.99 35 18
45 Cal 32.56 43 -
46 Arizona State 30.76 45 -
47 UCLA 30.33 46 -
48 Mississippi State 28.91 51 17
49 Syracuse 28.35 47 -
50 Kansas 27.06 50 -

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Uberleague Rank: October 31, 2010



Uberleague Rk Uberleague pts Rank last week 2010 AP Rating
1 Florida 306.80 1 -
2 Ohio State 282.88 2 8
3 USC 244.16 3 -
4 Texas 234.44 4 -
5 Alabama 222.54 5 5
6 Oregon 195.69 7 1
7 LSU 195.10 8 12
8 Florida State 194.06 6 2
9 Oklahoma 192.01 9 11
10 Nebraska 174.91 12 9
11 Miami 174.77 10 -
12 Boise State 172.33 11 2
13 Auburn 158.19 13 3
14 Georgia 149.71 14 -
15 Virginia Tech 148.36 15 2
16 Penn State 136.60 16 -
17 Michigan 132.34 17 -
18 TCU 130.50 18 4
19 Utah 129.24 19 6
20 Tennessee 120.15 20 -
21 Wisconsin 117.37 21 7
22 Iowa 96.33 22 15
23 West Virginia 79.92 23
24 Notre Dame 68.33 25
25 Kansas State 65.01 26 -
26 Missouri 62.93 24 14
27 BYU 61.63 27 -
28 Colorado 49.81 29 -
29 Louisville 47.16 30 -
30 Texas Tech 46.45 31 -
31 Washington 46.01 32 -
32 Boston College 45.58 33
-
This is the cut.
-
33Georgia Tech 45.46 34 -
34 Cincinnati 43.55 35 -
35 Arizona 39.99 38 13
36 Ole Miss 39.99 36 -
37 Washington State 38.18 37 -
38 Oregon State 37.16 39 -
39 Texas A&M 36.88 40 -
40 Clemson 36.68 41 -
41 Michigan State 33.25 28 16
42 Arkansas 32.99 43 17
43 Cal 32.56 42 -
44 Stanford 32.13 48 10
45 Arizona State 30.76 44 -
46 UCLA 30.33 45 -
47 Syracuse 28.35 46 -
48 Oklahoma State 28.11 47 19
49 NC State 27.18 58 23
50 Kansas 27.06 49 -